Tuesday, May 17, 2011

Shock value in art

Recently while enjoying my Barbara Nadel detective novel(!), I was provoked to consider the shock value in art. Contemporary art and you may disagree, is distinguished from traditional art by its deliberate use as social comment. Not content with mere aesthetics, it tries to convey views on societal norms.

As an example, I once saw an ArtXpress entry on eating meat. The pig was eating a human surrounded by mounted human heads in the room. Shocking? Yes. Did I get the message? I certainly remembered it even if I didn't convert to vegetarianism. Was it beautiful? No and I don't think I want it on my wall!

Who remembers the Bill Henson controversy over his use of nude pubescent models? And Damian Hirst with his dead animals? I think the question that Barbara Nadel's book raised was how far is too far? Bill skirted with child pornography and Damian with death; both taboo subjects. In the book the artist murders his children and had them embalmed and dressed like shadow puppets for a show. All in the name of art!